Cadbury Lite vs. Cadbury Dairy Milk
Several years ago, a few ‘lower fat’ chocolate bars were let loose in Australia, but most of them (i.e. ‘Flyte’) never really took off (pun intended). However, two types are still around, but remain very low key: Mars Lite (which essentially turns a 60g bar into 40g – hey presto, it’s lower in fat) and Cadbury ‘Lite’ with ‘Lower Carb’ as the main feature.
Naturally, anything called ‘Lite’ as a deliberate mis-spelling is not legally bound to be lower fat, lower sugar, lower salt, lower anything. It can be compared to labelling a bucket of nuclear waste ‘Sayfe Enuff for U’. Also, the bar is flatter and slimmer than the regular 250g Dairy Milk block, so it is designed to make you think it is lighter, healthier, better. Yeah, right, plus being triple the price per kilogram compared to the good old, reliable, always-there-for-you dairy milk might lure a few suckers in, thinking that they’re paying for higher quality.
With this rather negative frame of mind, I nervously snapped off a couple of squares and slowly chewed. It was pretty good actually. If it was a blindfold test I’d still be able to detect that it was ‘Cadbury something’ but know that it wasn’t quite as creamy and melt-in-the mouth as dairy milk. Almost a kind of cheaper, Easter Egg-style chocolate or the stuff swept up from the floor and then re-melted to cover over marshmallows or broken crunchie pieces (also known cynically to me as ‘Chocettes’).
Then it was time – after inhaling the rest of the 75g bar – to flip over the wrapper and look at the ingredients.
Cadbury Lite - per 100g:
- 1690 kilojoules
- 29.7g fat
- 7g of carbs of which 5.5g are sugars
- Ingredients: isomalt, polydextrose, full cream milk powder, cocoa butter, cocoa mass….
What on earth is isomalt and polydextrose and what were they doing being the two main ingredients? In addition, having powdered milk coming in at number three on the list of ingredients would most certainly indicate that this recipe wouldn’t have the standard ‘Glass and A Half of Full Cream Dairy Milk in Every 200g Block’ quality we’ve all long come to expect from Cadbury.
Then it was on to the never-say-die, your-friend-till-the-end, perennially-faithful even though you may wander through the fields of unfaithfulness via Lindt, Nestle, Baci and Haighs – the stayer of them all - Cadbury Dairy Milk.
Cadbury Dairy Milk per 100g:
- 2200 kg energy (hmm, these were called ‘kilojoules’ in the Lite bar)
- 29.5g fat
- 57.2g carbohydrates of which 55.8% are sugars
- Ingredients: full cream milk, sugar, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, milk solids, emulsifiers….
Alrighty then. So at least I could understand what I was eating – a good old honest serve of milk, sugar and cocoa butter with only about 0.2g more of fat than the ‘lite’ version. This had a much better taste but with more ‘carbs’ and made me realise that the ‘lite’ version wasn’t a patch on the original – it was just being a pale imitation for the carbophobes still amongst us.
What’s wrong with carbs anyway? Hasn’t the anti-carb coalition-of-the-willing since admitted that there were no Carbs of Mass Destruction in our Dietary World, and that it was fats and sugars that were the main threats to our lives as we knew it? Well, I hope so – I’d much rather eat cocoa butter and sugar than isomalt and polydextrose.
Posted by Kath on 29 Mar 2007 at 01:03 PM
| 12 Comments
Filed in Reviews


March 29, 2007 : 1:39pm
Heh, the carbs are from the milk. Those of us low-carbing it stick to Lindt 70% bars ;)
March 30, 2007 : 4:39am
I love chocolate!
April 26, 2007 : 11:07am
im sorry dairy milk is just too milky for me,its a big no no, i honestly could not eat another chocolate lump such as this, i would rather smother my genitals in fishpaste and dangle them in a pool of pirahnas than eat another chocolate poop like this
May 25, 2007 : 8:04pm
WOULD SOMEONE TELL ME HO MANY GRAMS OF SUGAR IS IN A REGULAR BAR OF DAIRY MILK!!!!!!
pwease???
May 29, 2007 : 8:18pm
umm i thinks it like 29.7 or something?
June 15, 2007 : 4:12am
heyy ii love chocolate so0 much its so0 umm && im so0 fat coz ii eat chocolate 24/7 anywaiiz im goin to eat 4 big blocks of chocolate baii
June 15, 2007 : 4:13am
heyy its me again ii love this site it makes me crave for choclate xXxxxxxxXxxxxxXxxxxxXxxxXx
July 28, 2007 : 12:45pm
I used to buy cadburys but several years ago it began to taste a little different from the chocolate i had always loved. Perhaps sacrificing quality a bit to make more profit? Anyway, I rarely buy plain cadbury now, preferring the filled varieties, and mostly I now go to Haighs instead.
October 19, 2007 : 2:09pm
i dont find cadburys as nice as it used to be it think there must be so much rubbish going into them now! its crazy, i now buy filled bars as there is less of the choclate in them.
June 10, 2008 : 8:30am
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeyh for my birth day all i git is chocolate but like iiiiiiiiiiii looooooooooooooooove chocolate i have nearly gone mental over it
keeeeeeeeeeeep eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeating it ittttttttttttts yuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmy
love me
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
June 29, 2008 : 7:09pm
Of course in your review you haven’t taken any account that this sort of chocolate might have a purpose. That being thos of us who are unfortunate to be Diabetic, not through any fault of our own.
So chocolate that isn’t carb loaded is essential to us, unless you think we just shouldn’t have it full stop?
June 30, 2008 : 9:51am
Roy - this kind of chocolate does have a purpose - a marketing purpose. And I’m not convinced it’s suitable for diabetics anyway. There’s little point in producing a “lite” version of a product if it doesn’t taste nice. You’d probably be better off finding a high quality very dark chocolate than filling your body with rubbish.
Oh - and I’m editor of Chocablog and spent six years on a highly restrictive diet while I was on dialysis, where chocolate was completely forbidden-so I do have some experience of this kind of thing.